TRANSLOCATING LIONS FROM GUJARAT TO M.P. WILL BE DISASTROUS !!!
“If it was told that there is one forest/park and all the Lions of India are there in this park and any epidemic can wipe all of them out – you would also say, that some lions need to be translocated” We too thought so, until we got deeper into it to understand how certain facts are misrepresented, ignored and covered up for the benefit of ....... We try bringing the facts on the table for the conservation and well being of the Asiatic Lions !!!


Empower's Anti-Translocation (to MP) Report

BACKGROUND : This reports comes in light of the long hanging issue on Translocations of Lions from Gujarat to M.P. basis the threat of concentration risk of Lions in Gir, Gujarat. As a layman, the same sounds logical and rationale,until one gets deeper into the issue, which was our endeavor. 

The Hon’ble Supreme Court recently ordered the translocation on the grounds of Government of Gujarat’s anthropocentric argument of the Lion being the family member and a part of the civilization and culture and pride of the state being not strong argument for staying the translocation and have rather asked for ecocentric views and scientific reasoning on the subject. The Government has filed for Review Petition on the order and Empower Foundation's endevour was to support the cause in the larger interest of Wildlife Conservation, with ecocentric views and scientific reasoning rather than anthropocentric arguments which the Hon’ble court had discounted. 

OUR ANALYSIS & ITS BASIS : The report is based on 3 important aspects : 

  1. Analysis post field visit of the Lion habitat in Gujarat, which is not just Gir but much much beyond the same, unfortunately, what is not being rightly and strongly positioned by the government and the media.
  2. Study of International Translocation failures, Animal Stress and IUCN guidelines violations which proves, translocation unfavourable for the Lions.
  3. Comparative Analysis of Kuno Palpur and Sheopur area with the current Lion habitat in Gir, which proves that the translocation of the Lions can fail big time due to a 12 adverse reasons. The Govt. of MP on its website has also listed Sheopur as a chronic draught prone area.


OUR RECOMMENDATION : Basis the above 3 important areas, we strongly recommend that the Lions should be allowed to “migrate only naturally  (through corridors) and “not be manually translocated” and even if the need arises, translocation can be tried, surely not to Kuno Palpur in Madhya Pradesh, which will result into a failed translocation and extinction of the endangered lions from the new proposed habitat, a big loss to the wildlife ! The analytical report is of 44 pages, but below is an Executive Summary of the same.

We respect the views of activists in favour of translocation, which could look correct only from a certain point unless one digs deep in, which this report tries by bringing a holistic view backed by data, international best practices and results on the issue. It is small contribution from our end to Conserve the Lions (even one or two lions dying due to a faulty translocation is an issue) and we hope this helps save not just Lions, but other wildlife (Tigers and bears present in Kuno) and humans around the proposed location, which could come under conflict as seen in the past internationally and in India !  

With Best Regards,

For Empower Foundation,

Jalpesh Mehta
Founder Chairman



SUMMARY - WHY LIONS SHOULD NOT BE TRANSLOCATED FROM GUJARAT, ESPECIALLY TO KUNO PALPUR, M.P.



1
Argument of Concentration risk in Gir National Park and hence impact of Epidemic is Incorrect. Reasonings as below :
      1. Lions are not present only in Gir National Park, but over a period of time have migrated naturally hundred of kilometers away to places like Amreli, Savarkundla, Liliya Porbandar, Paniya, Mitiyala, Barda, Una, Chhara, Sutrapada, Babariya, Kodinar, Visavadar, Hipavadli, Jamvada, Jasadhar, Girnar, Bhavnagar and Palitana. The 1412 sq km abode of Asiatic Lions has now spread across 10500 sq km thus mitigating concentration risk in one area. Some areas are as far as distances between many tiger reserves (eg. Sasan to Hipavadli, Barda, Porbandar is as far as Kuno to Ranthambhor and twice the distance between Bandipur to Nagarhole or Waynad Tiger reserves or Pench Maharashtra and Pench MP and Kanha).
      1. If an Epidemic can kill all the Lions, similarly, can kill all the Tigers in the MP-Rajasthan-Maharashtra Belt (Pench-Kanha-Bandhavgarh-Ranthambhor) and South India Karnataka-Kerala-Tamilnadu Belt (Mudumalai-Nagarhole-Bandipur-Waynad) as the distance almost similar between Gir and other areas as compared to the Tiger reserves in the above belt. (Ref. detailed report)
      1. It is recommended that the authorities, rather than communicating every where that Gir is the only Abode of Asiatic Lions and houses Asias last and only, 411 Lions (as per 2010 Census), change the positioning to the correct fact with correct number of Lions in Gir and outside Gir or in Greater Gir RegionorSaurashtra Region, not limited to Gir to correct the world perception of the issue. (www.gujarattourism.com , www.gujaratforest.com still state as above, which needs to be rectified and maybe a brand building exercise to rectify the perception.
2
International Perspective and technicalities on Translocation Failures and allied negativities around translocation
2.1
Animal Stress : A Key reason of Translocation Failure – A technical analysis

Since the main components of translocationcapture, captivity, transport, and release to novel areaare all individually stressful events, translocated animals will inevitably experience a state of chronic stress, which can lead to changes in both the stress response physiology (fight-or-flight responsiveness, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) drive, hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis function, and overall glucocorticoid (GC) secretion and in function of the immune system and behavioral coping strategies as stated by Dickens et al, 2010,Stress: An inevitable component of animal translocation. 

It is concluded, that all translocated animals will be chronically-stressed to various degrees upon release making them more vulnerable to other environmental factors, and thereby amplifies the potential problems encountered when released such as succumbing to (1) disease (2) reproductivity issues (3) dispersion (4) starvation or (5) predation

With respect to Kuno-Palpur Sanctuary, chances of predation and infighting with Tigers and bears, dispersion to nearby tiger territories like Ranthambhor (from where 2 tigers traveled into Kuno in January 2013), starvation due to low prey base and adverse drought like climate (also as confirmed by MP Government for Sheopur district) besides serious genetic disorders, diseases and reproductivity issues is confirmed.


2.2
Failed Translocation – Case Studies Analysis at International Level


Translocation of large carnivores is a sophisticated management practice with a relatively low success and also as rarely a suitable strategy as per P. Chardonnet & team in their work, Managing the Conflicts between People and Lion. Also termed as more of a public-relations exercise than an effective management tool (Linnell et al., 1997; Woodroffe and Frank, 2005).
  • Lions have territorial social systems, large carnivores should only be translocated when unoccupied habitat is available (Frank and Woodroffe, 2002); otherwise competition with other carnivores, will have a negative impact on prey populations and ultimately reduce the lion population, thanks to the presence of the Tigers in Kuno.
  • Where attempts to relocate lion are unsuccessful, lions become extremely cunning and seldom show homing behavior or return to kills. For recurrent offenders, elimination is often the best solution as per the above paper. This is one reason why the Lions translocated to Kuno Palpur in 1904, turned to raiding livestock and also man-eating . Subsequently, all were tracked down and shot. A repeat of which is highly probable.
  • 10 Case Studies of Translocation failures covering Elephants, Gaurs, Leopards, Rhinos, African and Asiatic Lions (From Gir to Chandraprabha Wildlife Sanctuary in UP in 1956) show only 16% Success rate in translocation in 119 animals studied with the rest returning back (causing major conflicts), dying or being killed by locals due to severe conflicts, with no history of any major successful translocation in India !
  • Feedback from various conservationists, wildlife activists and lovers prove that Translocation of Lions is not correct, especially, to an adverse habitat like Kuno Palpur !
2.3
Growing Lion Trade at International levels


As per LionAid, In India, all carcasses of tigers are considered poaching incidents until other reasons for mortality can be supported. Perhaps lion carcasses should now be treated with the same degree of suspicion (China values skeleton of lion at $10000).

2.4
IUCN Guidelines on Translocation – Potential Risk and could be Violations

Sec
IUCN Guidelines (Clause)
Our views which could be violations
3.2
Identification and correction (removal) of the threats of previous extinctions
Not yet done with increasing poaching in MP, even Kuno Palpur (as recent as in April 2012.)
3.6
Acceptability for the animals areas ecology, and the social and economic interests of its human communities.
Sheopurs Gun-culture (4800 licenses in 6 lac population), Hunting tribes like Sahariya & Ladars still present in Chambals dacoits refuge area.
3.8
In high uncertainty issues, alternative conservation solutions should be sought
Alternatives in Gujarat itself outside Gir not yet tried. The same should be tried first.
6.2
Translocation of species outside the indigenous range has high risk and impacts at the destination on other species and its own performance
Presence of Tigers (2 recent movements from Ranthambhor in January 2012 as per TOI dt Apr 25, 2013) and also presence of Bears pose a danger for the Lions besides above issues.

3
Comparative Analysis of Kuno Palpur and Sheopur area with the current Lion habitat in GujaratA summary or adversities (Detailed analysis in the Report)

The following issues makes Kuno-Palpur a complete incompetent location for Lions, if translocated :
  1. M.P. is a Major poaching ground as it lost 453 tigers out of 710 (63% loss) in a decade with 257 tigers remaining as of 2011 Census. This loss was worlds 50% share of tiger deaths (1079) over the last decade (2000 to 2010)
  2. Sariska and Panna lost all their tiger recently. (28 and 25) and so did Kuno Palpur (25 to 2)
  3. Sensitive locationsituated on the border of 3 statesM.P., Rajasthan and Uttar PradeshPoaching and infiltration and allied crime very high due to the location.
  4. Strong Gun culture in Sheopur district (4800 fire arm licenses (unoffical fire arms not known) for a population of 6 lacs) where the Sanctuary, once a hub of dacoits of Chambal is located.
  5. History of failed Lion translocation by Maharaja of Gwalior (1904) with no lions living today
  6. Adverse Hilly Terrain of Kuno-Palpur forest with very less water sources unlike Gir region
  7. Very Low Prey base consisting primarily of Langurs, which is the last food option for any Lion
  8. Extreme temperatures (Minium 2°C and Maximum 49°C) fatal for Lions.
  9. Sheopur district ranked as a high draught prone district by Govt. Of MP (mpkrishi.org)
  10. IIFM, Bhopal reported that Sheopurs poor area extent and forest cover is basically reflecting the pressure on forest as well as climatic conditions.
  11. Tigers and Bears live in Kuno-Palpur (2 tiger movements from the nearby, Ranthambhor recently in 2012-13) and this would lead to infighting and territorial wars.
  12. Sanctuaries like Bandhavgarh, Kanha, Pench, M.P. relies strongly on Tourism as a Revenue rather than Conservation also as reported by The Times of India, with same fate in Kuno.


Basis above, we strongly oppose manual Translocation of Lions, moresoever to Kuno Palpur Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh


More on the Foundation & the Team on About Us page